Economic democracy is one philosophy of socioeconomics. Socioeconomics is the study and exploration of economics when viewed in the context of human social values, behaviors, and interactions. Within this context, economic democracy advocates taking power away from the rich minority and giving it to the people. Essentially, it is a form of economic socialism in which the workers control production.
Models of economic democracy can take many forms, both in a theoretical framework and when applied to real-world situations. Yet all approaches share basic core values. The philosophy dictates that all people should have access to common resources such as land, water, and raw materials. Artificial scarcity fabricated by big business should be removed, and consumer purchasing power should be increased.
The basic economic problem as defined by the economic democracy philosophy is that society as a whole does not earn enough money to purchase everything it produces and manufactures. The reason for this is that a small group of people hold a majority of the wealth. They use that wealth, not for the well-being of their workers, but to make themselves and other shareholders even wealthier. This inequality, according to the philosophy of economic democracy, leads to poverty, unemployment, and starvation.
Approaches to how to solve this problem vary in intensity and scope. Many proponents of the grassroots approach to economic democracy believe that they can escape the capitalist model by forming workers' cooperatives. A group of people who share similar skills join together to run a business. Each member of the cooperative will own or rent part of the building, pool money for utilities and advertising, and gain an equal share of the profits. Most workers' cooperatives today are run by groups of farmers or artists.
A more radical approach to economic democracy involves restructuring local, national, or world governments. Instead of controlling only their small cooperative, workers would essentially share ownership in every business. Property would not be owned by anyone and therefore could not be bought or sold. It could, however, be rented. The value of all land would be determined by how it is used.
Under this approach, banks will also be socially owned. Every person would have a right to a part of the profits made by businesses. Everyone works, but instead of getting paid, they get an equal share in the wealth. In this way, proponents argue that poverty, hunger, and war will virtually disappear.
