We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.
Advertiser Disclosure
Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.
How We Make Money
We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently of our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.
Home

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

What Is Achievement Motivation Theory?

Mary McMahon
By
Updated: May 17, 2024
Views: 12,217
Share

Achievement motivation theory is part of the three needs paradigm identified by psychologist David McClelland in his research on workplace dynamics and the different kinds of personalities that can be found in work environments. He determined that varying levels of needs for achievement, authority, and affiliation interplayed and shaped very different personalities. Some would rise more naturally to leadership positions while others might prefer more subordinate support roles. The proportions of these needs could also influence behavior and responses to social situations in the workplace.

Numerous social psychologists have studied the need for achievement in human populations and the way it impacts behaviors. People often experience both internal and external rewards when they accomplish something. This can increase the need over time, as people seek out experiences that create rewards, because rewards make them feel good. McClelland believed this need played a critical role in the development of specific personality reports and considered this when he developed the achievement motivation theory.

Under achievement motivation theory, an employee with a high need for achievement may tend to be more independent and goal-oriented. These staff members focus on what they can accomplish, and may not be as attentive to other issues in the workplace. Lower levels can create a good leader who is goal-oriented and able to keep a team on track, without being aggressive or unpleasant to be around. Very low levels may result in a lack of motivation, as the employee does not experience any sense of reward upon finishing projects or engaging in other activities.

McClelland felt this interacted with the need for authority, which could contribute to a rise to power, as well as the need for affiliation and association with other people. His achievement motivation theory suggested that employers could screen incoming staff members to determine if they were a good fit, and to figure out where to assign them. A staff member with a high need for achievement might languish in one department and thrive in another, and finding an appropriate place for a new employee might promote general well being and job satisfaction.

Like many psychological theories, the achievement motivation theory builds on previous understanding about social psychology and internal motivations. Researchers with an interest in this topic can use tools like surveys and observational studies to see how different personality types play out in the workplace. They can devise screening tests to help employers place employees more accurately and effectively, and can perform follow-up studies to see how successful their efforts are in the long term.

Share
WiseGeek is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.
Mary McMahon
By Mary McMahon

Ever since she began contributing to the site several years ago, Mary has embraced the exciting challenge of being a WiseGeek researcher and writer. Mary has a liberal arts degree from Goddard College and spends her free time reading, cooking, and exploring the great outdoors.

Editors' Picks

Discussion Comments
By ZipLine — On Mar 02, 2014

Screening people to see if they are a good fit for a position is a must. But I'm not sure how employees can determine if the candidate is an "achiever." Are there specific questions that can be asked to rate candidates based on this? Or is this an analysis that the employer has to make based on the answers the candidate gave during the interview, his body language, etc?

Even if people are not screened according to the achievement theory of motivation, I'm sure that everyone will eventually end up where they belong. Like the article said, and achiever is going to move up while a non-achiever will stay put or move down in the organization. But if they in the right position from the beginning, that will save time and it will be in the best interests of the organization.

By SteamLouis — On Mar 01, 2014

@burcinc-- I have no idea what this theory implies about motivation and job performance. I think the theory is more related to job satisfaction and the hiring process.

What McClelland is trying to say is that if people are misplaced within the organization, this will cause problems. The organization will not run as well and employees will be dissatisfied. The theory is entirely about placing people with high levels of achievement needs in leadership positions while placing those with low levels of achievement in subordinate roles. I'm not sure if we can make any assumptions about motivation techniques from this theory.

By burcinc — On Mar 01, 2014

This is very interesting. Every organization uses rewards to some degree to increase employee motivation and performance. But if McClelland's findings are true, this means that employees with very low needs of achievement will not be affected by motivation strategies. I don't think that most workplaces take this into consideration.

Mary McMahon
Mary McMahon

Ever since she began contributing to the site several years ago, Mary has embraced the exciting challenge of being a...

Learn more
Share
https://www.wisegeek.net/what-is-achievement-motivation-theory.htm
Copy this link
WiseGeek, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

WiseGeek, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.