Preparation symbolizes a key element in mock trial cases from the perspective of both sides of the argument. Participants should practice before the date of the actual event and note weaknesses that need work. Facts of the mock trial cases should be scrutinized to develop strategies for questioning witnesses and preparing opening arguments. Learning the rules of evidence, courtroom protocol, and effective questioning techniques are all important.
Discussion of major points can be held ahead of time to prepare for evidence that might be introduced by the opposing sides of mock trial cases. This might lead to discovery of weak spots in affidavits or prior written statements of potential witnesses. Studying mock trial cases from both sides enables participants to anticipate witness testimony and strategies of opponents.
Opening and closing statements in mock trials become more effective if they are memorized and not read out loud. Using clear language without legalese during these two important periods of the trial is generally advised. Closing arguments should not be composed too early, or they might miss main points raised during mock trial cases. A closing argument should sum up evidence presented during the proceeding and highlight evidence that supports a position.
Practice sessions for mock trials might include instructions on flexibility. This helps participants think quickly when they cannot anticipate how a judge might rule on an objection, or when testimony comes from the opposition. A trial run also allows preparation for dealing with conflicting evidence or testimony ahead of time.
Mock trial cases typically provide valuable information for attorneys preparing for actual trials. In these instances, lawyers do not dwell on winning or losing during mock trial cases, but focus on what they can learn from jurors. When lawyers thoroughly interview jurors after the case, a wealth of information might surface that helps them prepare their case.
The credibility of witnesses suggests areas where a lawyer might conduct coaching. Jurors should be asked if any witness’s testimony swayed their decision, and what weakness each witness showed. Some attorneys videotape jury deliberations in mock trial cases to illustrate how jurors perceive witnesses. This information might be useful to prepare potential witnesses for greater credibility during actual trial.
Attorneys also glean valuable personal information from questioning jurors after mock trials. Jurors might assess how the lawyers performed and point out habits or demeanors they found offensive. The lawyer might ask what he or she could have done differently to influence the jury’s decision. Input from jurors enables attorneys to determine strengths and weaknesses in the case.
