We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.
Advertiser Disclosure
Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.
How We Make Money
We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently of our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.
Finance

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

What are Implied Powers?

Mary McMahon
By
Updated: May 17, 2024
Views: 42,569
Share

Implied powers are powers that are not explicitly spelled out in a contract or legal document but can be assumed because, without those powers, the document would not be functional. This term is commonly used in the context of the laws of the United States, although many other legal systems create room such powers. Having them creates some flexibility, and these powers can be challenged, ensuring that grabs for control do not result in a person or government seizing powers that are not, in fact, implied.

The classic example of implied powers in the United States comes up in the context of the Constitution. The Constitution is a relatively simple and straightforward document that sets out the branches of government, discusses specific powers, and delegates other powers to the states under the 10th Amendment in the Bill of Rights. Under the so-called "necessary and proper clause," however, the United States government has asserted a number of implied powers.

The logic of this is that some of the powers spelled out in the Constitution require other powers, particularly for the legislature. As such, it is assumed that, if a power is needed to accomplish something that is "necessary and proper" to the running of the United States, it should be granted. In some cases, Congress has asserted such powers and had them challenged in court, illustrating that there is a mechanism in place both for assuming these powers and questioning them. The challenge from the State of Maryland over the establishment of the Bank of the United States is an example of a situation in which Congress used implied powers, had those powers challenged, and was vindicated in court.

Without implied powers, every single power would need to be carefully laid out. If changes needed to be made in order to ensure the smooth running of the country, they would have to be moved through the legislative process. This could result in costly and substantial delays that would hinder the operations of the government and potentially threaten national security.

Having powers be implied is not the same thing as having the ability to seize any powers. The Constitution is very meticulous about the separation of powers and attempts to blend the three branches of government would likely not stand up in court. Likewise, the United States empowers citizens as well as government agencies to challenge policies and the law, providing a system for challenges to attempts to exercise powers not granted under the Constitution.

Share
WiseGeek is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.
Mary McMahon
By Mary McMahon

Ever since she began contributing to the site several years ago, Mary has embraced the exciting challenge of being a WiseGeek researcher and writer. Mary has a liberal arts degree from Goddard College and spends her free time reading, cooking, and exploring the great outdoors.

Editors' Picks

Discussion Comments
By mutsy — On Feb 25, 2011

Sunny27 - I think that if congress was really interested in applying the implied powers and the necessary and proper clause with respect to health care legislation they would allow insurance to be sold across state lines.

This way the increased competition would push insurance prices down and more people could afford to buy insurance. By doing this the consumer gets to choose what plan is best and will get a lower price for their insurance needs.

We will not have to add the budget deficit for these savings to occur yet congress seems okay with bankrupting the United States and threatening our AAA bond rating.

By latte31 — On Feb 22, 2011

Crispety- I agree wholeheartedly. The states have reserved powers under the 10th amendment too. For example, the recent passage of the socialized health care bill was deemed unconstitutional by two federal courts because it tries to regulate interstate commerce by forcing US citizens to purchase health care coverage or face fines and incarceration.

The last federal court judge threw out the entire bill saying that the whole thing was unconstitutional yet our federal government is acting like no such ruling took place.

I know that the founders of our country despised a strong central government because of the bad experience with the tyranny of the British.

The constitution of the United States is not being respected when we pass laws that are unconstitutional and we act like nothing ever happened. I can’t wait for the Supreme Court to hear the case. Maybe then the federal government would be forced to respect the states more.

By Crispety — On Feb 21, 2011

I think that a case that expresses the implied powers of congress was McCulloch v Maryland. In the McCulloch v Maryland implied powers case the state of Maryland lost the right to tax a bank created by the federal government.

Justice Marshall noted that congress had the right to establish a federal bank and the states did not have the right to tax it.

The elastic clause implies that congress has the right to create laws that they deem appropriate and creating the bank was what congress wanted to do.

I think that the implied powers of congress have gone a bit too far and some of the bills that they are passing do not seem right for the people of the United States.

Mary McMahon
Mary McMahon

Ever since she began contributing to the site several years ago, Mary has embraced the exciting challenge of being a...

Learn more
Share
https://www.wisegeek.net/what-are-implied-powers.htm
Copy this link
WiseGeek, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

WiseGeek, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.