We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What Is the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986?

By Pablo Garcia
Updated May 17, 2024
Our promise to you
WiseGEEK is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At WiseGEEK, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

The Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (IRCA), also known as the Simpson-Mazzoli Act, was signed by President Ronald Reagan on 6 November 1986. Congress enacted it to control unauthorized immigration to the US. Its main provisions were employer sanctions for hiring undocumented migrants, increased appropriations for border security, and a window of amnesty and legalization for some unauthorized immigrants already living in the US.

The cornerstone of the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 was the inclusion of employer sanctions. IRCA employer sanctions represented the greatest expansion of regulatory power since the enactment of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1980 (OSHA). IRCA made three employer actions illegal. Knowingly hiring persons not authorized to be in the US was the most serious offense. Continued employment of unauthorized workers and hiring workers without correctly verifying their identity were also federal offenses.

In reaction to criticism that IRCA would make employers de facto immigration officials, the burden on employers was reduced to accepting documents that reasonably appeared to be genuine. Other critics believed that employers were not equipped to handle the screening of worker legal status, and that a national identification card should be adopted in the US. Later critics argued that employer sanctions under IRCA were not pursued aggressively enough.

Following passage of the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, US Border Patrol staffing increased by fifty percent. There was also a sudden increase in the apprehension and return of unauthorized aliens entering from the US-Mexican border. Additional funding was set aside to expedite removal of unauthorized aliens having recently entered the country.

Approximately 2,650,000 undocumented immigrants were granted legal status under the provisions of the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986. It is still the largest legalization process in history. IRCA legalization was a two-step process. Undocumented immigrants who had lived in the US since before 1 January 1982 could apply for temporary legal status by 4 May 1988.

Temporary residents could become permanent “green card” residents after 18 months. During this 18-month period, temporary residents were ineligible for public benefits. At the permanent resident stage, temporary residents had to show the ability to speak the English language and a basic knowledge of American civics.

Statistically, about twelve percent of the immigrants who achieved temporary resident status did not go on to become permanent residents. It is not clear how many people denied temporary resident status remained in the US as unauthorized immigrants and how many returned to their country of origin. Policy analysts point out that there was no IRCA plan for those who did not qualify for temporary residency.

WiseGEEK is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.

Discussion Comments

By Feryll — On May 23, 2014

There is some irony in the fact that President Reagan is held up by some conservatives as a great protector of the country who made an effort to stop the flow of immigrants to the country for the betterment of the country. When in fact, it is closer to the truth to say that Reagan was more interested in protecting illegal aliens than expelling them from the country.

The former President knew that illegal immigrants were being abused and would continue to be abused until they had some type of legal standing. Nearly 3 million people (immigrants) took advantage of the amnesty clause in Reagan's immigration reform and control act

By Sporkasia — On May 22, 2014

The Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 had several serious problems that limited the legislation's chances of being very effective.

First of all, many influential people at the time used the labor of illegal immigrants and they did not want to be held legally responsible for making certain their workers were in the country legally, and they did not want to lose their employees. Because of this, much of the act's wording in reference to employer responsibility was watered down before the bill became law.

The article pointed out that the security at the borders was increased. However, an increase of 50 percent was no where near what would be needed to stop the flow of illegal immigrants into the United States.

More than anything, what the Reagan immigration act did is allow illegal immigrants living in the U.S. a chance to gain legal status through the amnesty clause. Many people think this potion of the law was what hindered its success, but I think this is the sole saving grace of the legislature.

By Drentel — On May 21, 2014
The Reagan Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 had everything in place to take care of the immigration problems that the United States is faced with at the moment. Instead of searching for new immigrations bills, we should enforce what we have and allow the law to work as it was designed to work when it was passed in 1986.
WiseGEEK, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

WiseGEEK, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.