We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What is a Request for Comments?

M. McGee
By M. McGee
Updated May 17, 2024
Our promise to you
WiseGEEK is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At WiseGEEK, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

A Request for Comments is the proper name for a memo issued by the Internet Engineering Task Force (EITF). This group oversees the standards and protocols related to Internet use and access. A Request for Comments details information related to any number of different Internet-based activities and technologies. Even though the name is specific to the EITF, the Internet Architecture Board (IAB) will also issue a Request for Comments, as will prominent Internet researchers.

These documents were originally actual requests for input from early Internet researchers. They were informal documents that asked for help on problems, input as to directions and methods and bragging points on technological innovations. In many cases, one Request for Comments would lead directly into the next, as problems from one were addressed in another. These messages were often sent as letters and mass mailings since e-mail was yet to be invented.

When these early researchers completed the Advanced Research Projects Agency Network (ARPANET), the predecessor to the Internet, the document began to change. The original documents were very informal and were considered far from official documents of any kind. The ability to send information electronically and collaborate as a group over long distances began to formalize the process. The documents began to be official declarations of the Network Working Group, a loosely organized group of researchers.

Over the years, the ownership of the official Request for Comments documents has changed. As ARPANET gave way to the Internet and networking groups came and went, the EITF eventually took over the document. While other organizations and individuals may publish a document under the same name, the ones published directly by the EITF are the only ones considered official.

Even as document ownership changed hands, the actual methods used in a Request for Comments have stayed the same. Each document, since the very first sent over ARPANET, is numbered and edited by the Network Working Group, even though that group doesn’t officially exist. The numbers are continuous; no document is ever removed from the listing. Each document is submitted and stored in plain text, and the entire document series is publicly available on the Internet. Together, they form a history of the technology and many of the people that created it.

Several document statuses make up the divisions of standard Request for Comment documents. An Informational document is one of the least defined; it can literally be anything from simple information to a fully realized standards change. Experimental documents define ideas that are theoretical at the time due to technological or monetary constraints, and a Best Current Practice document discusses standards and ideas related to the Internet, but not ones that the EIFT directly oversees. Historic documents have been made obsolete by later documents. Lastly, Unknown documents are considered oddballs that don’t fit anywhere else, including most of the original documents.

WiseGEEK is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.

Discussion Comments

WiseGEEK, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

WiseGEEK, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.